Author Seo Dong-jin at the 2000 Queer Film Festival |
One part of the article that sticks out is is the author's focus on how the lack of differentiation of homosexuals in Korean society can result in individual pain.
Although they do not exist as a significant social reality, they are, nonetheless, existential entities who suffer precisely because of their homosexuality. No matter what anyone says, it is clear that in our society, homosexuality is the cause of discontent. As a result, a "homosexual existence" implies change and resistance- a struggle for a better life. However, when social discourse claims that one does not exist, or in other words, when one is coerced into remaining a non-social entity, how does one effect changes regarding homosexuality issues? If a homosexual movement is only possible on the basis of collective subjectivity, how do homosexuals form a significant social identity? How do they form the basis for a progressive communicative situation regarding homosexuality? How do Korean lesbians, gays, and other sexual minorities create a normative foundation for a brighter future?
I unfortunately see this pain and frustration in my friends' lives... What I think it comes down is visibility; if queer Koreans don't come out, they will remain invisible. However, coming out has so many social implications that it is hard to expect queer Koreans to sacrifice their livelihoods in the name of gay rights. Can there be a Korean Stonewall?
Recent comments